Sunday, January 30, 2011

The EduGeek on Politics: Of Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Chaos

Brian the Education Geek writes an occasional blog with observations about life, geek stuff, politics, and just whatever strikes his fancy.



At the coffee shop yesterday morning, the headline on the newspaper's front page read "CAIRO DESCENDS INTO CHAOS." Chaos. A lot of that going around lately. In Egypt, in Tunisia with their popular uprising, in Greece with their debt situation.

Since about Y2K or so, I've seen a lot of ink/digital characters spilled about what all is wrong with American politics. So much of what I've read is merely partisan bickering, or is fuel to stoke the fires of partisan bickering, that it's been hard for me to put my finger on what it is that's gone awry in our political system. But the feeling is there--Morpheus in Hollywood's The Matrix described it as a splinter in my mind--the feeling that something is simply amiss, something larger than Democrats, Republicans, or anyone in between.

When I saw that word CHAOS in the newspaper yesterday, this feeling I speak of finally started to gel into something tangible. I think what's bothering me about politics in this country is the politics of chaos.

We in America generally don't think much in terms of chaos vis-a-vis our political system. And why should we? We've enjoyed centuries of the peaceful transfer of power in the White House and in the leadership of our states and cities. There's never been a war fought on our soil (save for our own civil war), and we have a system of checks and balances in our government (executive, legislative, and judicial), assuring that it's the will of the people that drives the laws and policies of the land.

But I doubt the countries of Egypt and Tunisia would have guessed a month ago that chaos would descend upon their governments the way it has. Personally, I share John Corbett's view on chaos, from his character Chris in the Morning on TV's Northern Exposure. He said, "No matter how much order you have in your life, chaos is always there. Waiting. Just beyond the horizon."

And now that I've actually been looking, I see signs of chaos in our political landscape all the time.

I see chaos in the form of political extremism. By extremism, I don't just mean politicians who lean far to the left or the right, mind you; I mean politicians like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush who didn't show one ounce of compromise in them during their respective presidencies, no give-and-take whatsoever. It was basically their way or the highway. Remember trickle-down economics? Remember Reagan's escalation of the Cold War? The war in Iraq? These things were going to happen, whether the people liked it or not. To me, that's extremism.

Yes, Barack Obama made this whole economic stimulus package thing happen (a stimulus that doesn't really seem to have helped the economy much, by the by). But the difference is that he at least sought public opinion on the matter before doing so. He met with grass-roots community leaders, had town hall meetings, he even made a blog on www.whitehouse.gov. That to me isn't extremism. Extremism to me is when a political leader says, "I've decided that X should happen, I have the votes necessary to get away with it, and to hell with anyone who says otherwise." Not in these words, of course, but that's the attitude. No debate, no question. And WOW have I seen a lot of that over the past 10 years or so.

I see chaos in the demeanor and the attitudes of more and more American voters, particularly after September 11, 2001. Nowadays, fear sells. And we're buying in droves. The news media, politicians, corporations, this Tea Party thing...they all seem to have an abundance of fear propaganda to supply the demand. We have to go fight the awful terrorists in Afghanistan, or someday they'll be beating down your door! We have to illegally wiretap some people in order to protect everyone! Vote Republican and you may lose your job to budget cuts! Vote Democrat and you may someday have to pay a few more dollars a year in taxes! EEK!

And all this fear is slowly manifesting itself in the voting booth, mainly in that more people seem to be voting for themselves now, rather than voting as a community. Health care reform, for example. Ten or 15 years ago, the need to reform our health care system would have been a no-brainer. For us, for our neighbors, for the common good. (Do you know at least one person who's had health care or health insurance problems?) But no longer. Now, even the most basic needs of the community at large seem to be overshadowed by our own personal concerns and fears. Now we cast the vote that we cast because we want to keep our gun. Or we don't want our taxes to go up. Or we don't want those carn-sarnded illegal aliens getting in! It's less about what's good for everyone, and more about what the voter is afraid of. Quite a chaotic situation if you ask me--for a country like ours that got to where we are today by sticking together and by celebrating our differences rather than fearing them.

I see chaos in the petty and ridiculous actions of our elected leaders lately, and in their abuse of the power we've given them. Like when the governor of South Carolina up and disappeared on us last summer, and we found out later that he was using his taxpayer-funded jet to go see his chickie friend in Argentina or wherever it was. Or when Representative Charles Rangell (D-New York) stepped down as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee last March amid accusations of taking corporate-sponsored trips to the Caribbean and of failure to pay income taxes on some of his real estate. And the hits just keep on coming:

"Geithner's Senate Confirmation Hearing Delayed By Republicans." That was for Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in January 09.

"No Further Delay of Liu Confirmation Hearing". That was was for 9th Circuit Court of appeals judge Goodwin Liu, whose confirmation hearings were delayed for months by Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alaska) and others, before finally proceeding last spring.

I found other incidents of such behavior, and the reasons given for creating these delays were many and varied, but of what I found, they had one thing in common: they had nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not the appointee was qualified to do the job.

The best may be yet to come, however; many of the newly-elected Republicans in congress have hinted that they'll sabotage the allocation of the funding necessary to implement health care reform. To me, this is chaos incarnate: Congress and the President pass a law, more than half of the American people support the law, yet dozens of our elected officials are apparently planning to use their political office to keep the law from happening.

Yeah.

I see chaos in the form of the vitriol and rudeness and general ugliness taking place in our government institutions. For example, remember the Joe Wilson thing a couple of years ago? This Joe Wilson (R-South Carolina) interrupted a speech being given by President Obama in the Capitol, by shouting "You lie!" This wasn't during a debate or a press conference; it was in the middle of the President's speech. The guy later apologized, but chaos--however slight--had been visited upon a proceeding that heretofore had known only order. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel would later point out that "No president has ever been treated that way. Ever." Now, are the words "You lie" particularly venomous? Hardly. But could they have waited for a press statement by Wilson later on? Duh. I imagine he simply wanted to say them where they'd have the most effect, with no thought toward maintaining simple respect and decency for the president that his country elected.

At the time, I thought this was merely an isolated incident, but I've seen stuff like this on a regular basis since then. Not so much outbursts directed at the President, but just general nastiness and infighting between politicians in general. Even between the people themselves. Whichever political philosophy holds sway at any given time, the other side is no longer merely indifferent or disgruntled about it; they're download nasty about it. They're angry. And folks, that's not what made America the great country that we are.

What it is, is very possibly the first baby steps toward a newspaper headline like the one I saw in the coffee shop...but one that reads "AMERICA DESCENTS INTO CHAOS."


E
ditor's note: I'm now on my third rewrite of this post, and its taken a ton of my time, so needless to say I won't be doing any more political posts for a while! Comment if you want, but I'll only read the non-political comments. Time to move on! There's too much cool tech stuff to write about...

Saturday, January 22, 2011

The EduGeek on Tech: Should Your Next Home Computer Have An Apple On It?

Brian the Education Geek writes an occasional blog with observations about life, geek stuff, politics, and just whatever strikes his fancy.



In my line of work, many of my customers ask for advice about their home computers. The most common of these questions: My home computer is old/slow, and what would you recommend for a replacement computer?

The answer I've been giving them, for about a year now, has been one that I never expected to give. Honestly, for most users, I recommend that their next home computer be a Mac.

A Mac.

Those of you who aren't as familiar with personal computers probably don't get why a Mac recommendation from me is so hard to believe. So, a little background if I may. There are two main kinds of personal computer out there, Mac and PC. Macs run Mac OS, and PCs run Microsoft Windows. Techno-geeks like myself generally are either in the Mac camp or the PC camp. We have what we believe to be sound reasons why we chose the personal computer type that we did, and once we start down one of these paths, in my experience it's rare that we switch to the other...or even speak favorably of the other.

It's kinda like Democrat or Republican. Ford or Chevy. Smooth or ribbed. Once you make your initial choice, never the twain shall meet.

The most die-hard of Mac people and PC people are known as fanboys of their chosen camp. They take every opportunity they can get to trump the advantages of their camp, and every opportunity to bash the other camp.

I am a PC person. I am not a PC fanboy, though I used to be. Nevertheless, for a PC person to recommend the purchase of a Mac, or vice versa, is almost unthinkable in the computer world. Yet there but for the grace of God go I, telling folks who want to know what computer to get for home use (most of them anyway) that they should get a Mac.

How did it come to this, you ask? What makes the EduGeek, a lifelong PC nerd, recommend a Mac? Long story short, it happened when I learned to put myself in the shoes of the person asking the question.

I haven't run across very many computer nerds--support techs, salespeople, developers--who can do that. I certainly don't claim to be the only one who can, I'm just saying that in my experience, it's rare. But objectivity is the thing that non-technical people need from technical people, even more than technical knowledge itself, when they ask for computer advice. Objectivity demands that I put aside my prejudices, put aside what I perceive to be the advantages of the PC platform over the Mac--so as to determine the needs of the particular customer who I happen to be working with at that moment.

So for example, even though I'm equally adept in Mac OS and Microsoft Windows 7, I have to concede that most of my customers would do better with the easier to use of the two, which at the moment is still Mac OS. Windows 7 is great and I love it, but overall it's still not quite as intuitive as Mac OS.

Macs are by and large more expensive that the equivalent PC--regardless of the PC manufacturer (with the possible exception of Sony)--so a given user can usually get a new personal computer for less money if they get a PC. On that basis alone, for years I told people, "Get a PC!" I've since learned, though, that of all the areas of life in which people want to save a buck, computer purchases aren't generally one of them. A home computer, once considered a novelty, is now an essential part of most households, and its something that most users seem willing to pay some extra for.

And although I may end up having my geek card pulled for this, I firmly believe that Mac computers...well, feel more expensive. By that I mean that when you use a Mac, you really get the feeling that you're using a high-end piece of hardware. From the sculpted aluminum computer case and keyboard, to the bright, crisp video display, to the highly-functional multitouch trackpad mouse...it just feels like a computing experience that's more worthy of the money you spend--however much money that is--than would a typical PC. There are exceptions, of course, but all in all it seems to me to be the Mac that delivers the more solid-looking and solid-feeling computer. It took a long time for me to understand that from the perspective of the user on the other end of the phone, the look and feel and overall experience of a computer is usually more important than is that extra few megahertz of clock speed or that extra few gigabytes of hard drive space.

Let's see, what else... ah yes, computer video games. My inner geek wants to tell users, "Get a PC! There are infinitely more computer video games for Windows than there are for Mac OS!" Then my customer service side steps in, and says "Really Brian? Is that what most of your users buy a home computer for? Video games?" In the end I must always concede, no. Your average user mainly just wants a computer to surf the web, do e-mail, manage finances, store the photos from their digital camera, that sort of thing. At most they might want to play a couple rounds of Sudoku, maybe some Bejeweled here and there, but nothing as involved as what your typical PC gamer (like myself) would want. Same with application programs, utilities, even small-business tools; while there are more of these for Windows than there are for the Mac, there's still a large enough array of them for Mac OS that most Mac users can find a program to suit their needs.

Most of all, though, it comes down to this: I know how much trouble the average user can get themselves into with a PC, even one runing Windows 7. I see it all the time at work: a user calls and says they clicked on a web link, and a message popped up on the computer telling them that they have all kinds of viruses and security threats on their computer, and Click Here To Remove. So of course they clicked, and of course the thing they clicked on promptly installed malware on their computer. You read that right: in an effort to remove the (false) threat of malware, users click on the very thing that installs the malware! From there, all manner of bad things happen--the computer slows down to a crawl, the user is prompted for their credit card number so that the fake program can continue to provide "virus protection," all kinds of popup messages appear, advertising Viagara or teeth whitener or ribbed condoms or whatever.

So what's next for the hapless PC user? Well, of course they take the computer to Geek Squad or some other computer repair shop. Who, in turn, dutifully repairs the computer (usually by completely wiping out the hard drive and reinstalling Windows 7, because that's likely all that you can do at that point)--charging however much money for this service they want. (I want to believe that computer repair shops charge a fair price, but what I know is that they know you can't be without your computer. And I suspect that's the more driving force behind the prices that they charge.)

And what are the chances of anything like this happening on a Mac? You guessed it--virtually zippo. For this reason more than any other, it's a Mac that I want to be in the hands of the average computer user. The user who doesn't know what malware is. Who doesn't know how to wipe and reinstall their computer. I know how to do these things of course, but understanding that most people don't was a big breakthrough for me.

Now, big disclaimer here (I probably should have started the blog post with this): Apple Computer Corporation is hardly one of my favorite companies. In fact, they've historically been one of my least favorite, yet another hurdle I had to overcome in my efforts to provide computer recommendations from the standpoint of the user rather than from myself. I don't much like the Big Boss over at Apple, Steve Jobs; to me, he exudes a lot more negative energy than positive, even when he's up on stage trumping some new product. I don't like the swift and harsh retributions faced by apple employees who--intentionally or otherwise--disclose details about upcoming Apple products to the press. I don't like that Macs only benefit from the computer technology that Steve Jobs wants them to benefit from--which is why, for example, there's no such thing as a Mac with a Blu-ray disc player. Or a VGA output for connecting an external monitor.

And while I stand by my previous statement that Apple computers feel like they give more bang for the buck than do PCs, I nevertheless wonder how much of the price difference between the Mac and PC comes from a Mac's (generally) higher-end hardware, and how much of it comes simply from the "sexy factor" and from the brand recognition currently enjoyed by Apple.

But my own personal feelings toward Apple, and the various reasons for those feelings, aside... it nevertheless seems to me that Apple has the upper hand these days, at least for home computers, for all the reasons mentioned above. I'll kick out another blog post in the coming weeks on using Macs at the workplace. Also upcoming will be a piece on pad computers.


--The EduGeek


Sunday, January 16, 2011

The Edu-Geek on Life: It's Not What Happens to You, It's What You Do About It

Brian the Education Geek writes an occasional blog with observations about life, geek stuff, politics, and just whatever strikes his fancy...

The Edu-Geek on Life: It's Not What Happens To You, It's What You Do About It


Back in the early 90's, about the time I graduated from college, I remember it was all the rage to get up in front of an audience and talk about some new idea about life or this or that--and to get the whole thing on video. Then take that video and sell it to some local TV station, private or public, as a "motivational" or "self-help" seminar. That's how that Deepak Chopra guy got popular as I recall; some of the other ones I remember were How to Raise a Child with Love and Logic, Rich Dad/Poor Dad, and Anthony Robbins. Maybe these shows were based on books that the lecturer had written in the past, I don't know; I just remember it being a thing.

I'd watch these shows from time to time when I was bored, and since I went through periods of unemployment lasting 6 months or more at a time back then, boredom was fairly routine. But only one of those shows really stuck with me, and has stayed in my mind right up until today--enough to be bloggable even.

It was a guy by the name of W. Mitchell. I had no recollection of his name--I just now had to look it up--and as far as I know, he never gained the popularity of the people/seminars I mentioned above. What I do remember, like it was yesterday, was his story.

I turned the TV to channel 12 one Saturday morning, and here was this guy in a wheelchair, burned to a crisp. That's not an exaggeration at all; every inch of him had these horrible-looking burns, and he'd obviously had to have his face reconstructed. He'd been in a motorcycle accident with a truck, and he barely lived through it--yet he went on to form a successful company, Vermont Castings. THEN, years later, the engine quit on his private plane during takeoff, and the resulting crash left him paralyzed and in a wheelchair.

It took a few minutes of watching the show for me to really wrap my mind around this. Think of it. You or I could go and lay down on I-25...TWICE...and still come out better than this guy did. So here he is, his life completely torn apart, with every reason in the world to give up hope. Yet what he keeps saying over and over, throughout the show, is this:

It's not what happens to you in life. It's what you do about it.

That was a concept that hadn't occurred to me up to that point, and to hear it for the first time--from about the last person I'd ever have expected to say it--really moved me. Because I wasn't watching it on a news report or reading about it in the Drama in Real Life section of Reader's Digest; I was seeing it right there before me. And I vowed at that moment to always remember this guy's experience, like a TSR (terminate-stay-resident) program on a computer, and to put whatever happens to me in this context.

Now I'm certainly no W. Mitchell, and I can't help but feel a small yet nagging sense of hypocrisy for taking on such a philosophy for myself. Why? Because honestly, not that much has happened to me. Not compared to W. Mitchell, and not compared to a great many of my friends and acquaintances. I've sustained no injuries or operations, I've only really lost one or two people who were close to me, I've not been laid off from my job in years, never been arrested... really its been a pretty quiet life overall. (Knock on Formica...)

But for me to feel completely hypocritical about my fascination with this philosophy would be to completely miss the point of what W. Mitchell was trying to say. Which is that it doesn't matter what's happened to you over the years and it doesn't matter whether or not you had any control over these events, what matters is what they have brought out in you. What, if anything, you've made the result of these events be.

Here's an example: subsequent to that Saturday morning, I found that I didn't complain about things NEARLY as much as I had previously. This was more a subconscious choice than it was a conscious one, and I wasn't really present to how much the experience of watching this show had curbed my complaining until I actually met complainers. REAL complainers. The kind that you just want to roundhouse-kick with everything you have, if only to give them something freakin' REAL to complain about! I hear these people complain, but what I see in my mind is W. Mitchell.

W. Mitchell certainly had other inspiring, moving, downright awesome philosophies to share that day as well. One I remember in particular was, "The people we meet in life are gifts. Fate's gifts to us. How many gifts do we throw away throughout our lives--just because we don't like the wrapping?" He was saying, of course, that the people you meet count as things that happen to you, and that you have a choice--judge them or appreciate them. With the friends and family that I have, you certainly don't have to tell ME twice to do the latter! Yet I might never have become present to just how lucky I am to have them, if I'd not heard this W. Mitchell character put it into words all those years ago.

W. Mitchell has written a book, "
It's Not What Happens To You, It's What You Do About It." I may pick it up at some point, now that I read books online (what few I read) and I don't have to lug them around. But for me, the benefit of having watched this self-help show that day has already been realized, no matter what.

For you though, I'm thinking that this book would be an AWFULLY good read, if you're so inclined. I promise, you will be moved...and you might even be moved enough to use it as the subject of your first-ever Internet blog!


--Brian
1-17-2011